Back to library Case study

13,598 audits in a single run, and more work kept in-house

Large-scale audit scheduling case study: 98.7% of 13,598 audits placed automatically, and internal work up from 59% to 73%.

Test it on your data
Certification bodyNetherlandsManagement systems2 min readIn English
13,598audits in one run
98.7%placed automatically
73%internal work (from 59%)
100%inside the window
Short answer

A European certification body placed 98.7% of 13,598 audits automatically in one run with ScheduleAI, and raised the share of work delivered by internal auditors from 59% to 73%.

Key takeaways

  1. 13,598 audits were placed in a single run, 98.7% automatically.
  2. The share of work done by internal auditors rose from 59% to 73%.
  3. Every date landed inside the start and due window.
  4. The plan overlapped 94% like-for-like with the client's own schedule; results were validated with the client.

The challenge

A full year of management-system audits, a mixed internal and external auditor pool, and strict windows for every certificate. The goal was to keep more work with internal auditors without breaking a single window.

More work kept in-house

The engine prefers qualified internal auditors first and only reaches for external capacity where no internal option fits the rules.

Share of audits done by internal auditors
Before59%
With ScheduleAI73%

Scale and accuracy

High overlap with the existing schedule shows the engine understood the organisation's rules; the differences are where it found better options.

98.7%placed automatically
100%dates inside the window
94%overlap with the client's own schedule

Status of the results

These results come from real production data and were validated with the client.

What this means for your body

01

Planning time

If monthly planning takes days, the allocation step can usually be cut to minutes.

02

Internal capacity

Using qualified internal auditors first reduces subcontracted days.

03

Travel

Clustering nearby audits cuts kilometres, hotel nights and emissions.

04

Compliance

Checking every allocation against the rules removes a common assessment finding.

See our guide to audit scheduling software and how to test it on your own data.

Check these results on your own data

  • ✓Share an extract of auditors, competences and one or two months of audits.
  • ✓Agree success criteria: planning time, share allocated automatically, utilisation, subcontracted days and travel.
  • ✓Compare the engine's plan with your real plan, audit by audit.
  • ✓Decide on a pilot only if the numbers hold.

For certification bodies, audit scheduling software that checks competence, rotation and windows on every audit takes most of this work off the planning team.

How ScheduleAI handles this

Run a year of your own audits through ScheduleAI and compare it with your current plan, audit by audit.

Book a demo Estimate your savings

Questions

Is 98.7% realistic for our data?

It depends on data quality. The custom demo measures it on your own audits before any commitment.

What does 94% overlap mean?

94% of allocations matched the client's own schedule like for like; the rest were improvements or exceptions.

Were these results measured on real data?

Yes. They come from the customer's own production data.

Can we see similar results?

A free two-week custom demo on your own data shows what's achievable for your programme.